MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067933977 · doi:10.1117/12.902314

Relation between sodium addition and excess selenium in Bridgman-grown CuInSe 2

2011· article· en· W2067933977 on OpenAlexaff
H.F. Myers, C.H. Champness, I. Shih

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmpouleStoichiometryQuartzSeleniumAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistrySodiumImpurityChalcopyriteMineralogyCrystallographyMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryMetallurgyPhysical chemistryCopper

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ingots containing cm-sized monocrystals of CuInSe2 have been grown in quartz ampoules by a vertical-Bridgman method. Included also in the ampoules were varying quantities of elemental Na, as well as excess Se above stoichiometry. Deposits were seen within the ampoules after growth, including a white deposit formed through a reaction of the Na with the quartz, and a reddish-brown deposit mostly containing Na and Se. Thermoelectric power measurements indicate that stoichiometric material grown with no excess Se and no Na is p-type. With the addition of Na above a critical amount to the ampoule, the resulting ingots were always n-type. This p to n conductivity type change is inhibited when excess Se is also present, and more Na is required for the change to occur. The critical amount of Na was found to be approximately twice the atomic amount of excess Se. XRD indicated that the chalcopyrite structure of the material was maintained with additions of up to 3 at. % Na, even as the material was changed from p- to n-type, and no sodium was detected in the bulk. It is suggested that a reaction between the Na and the Se occurs, resulting in the formation of Na2Se. The Se used in this reaction is therefore unable to be a part of the CuInSe2 lattice, thereby increasing the number of donor-like Se vacancies, rendering it n-type. In this model, the addition of excess Se replaces those Se atoms which react with the Na, so that the material remains p-type.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207