Short-term in vivo inhibition of nitric oxide synthase with <scp>L</scp>-NAME influences the contractile function of single left ventricular myocytes in rats
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of short-term L-NAME treatment on the contractile function of left ventricle (LV) myocytes and the expression of proteins related to Ca(2+) homeostasis. Data from Wistar rats treated with L-NAME (L group, n = 20; 0.7 g/L in drinking water; 7 days) were compared with results from untreated controls (C group, n = 20). Cardiomyocytes from the L group showed increased (p < 0.05) fractional shortening (23%) and maximum rate of shortening (20%) compared with the C group. LV from the L group also showed increased (p < 0.05) expression of the ryanodine receptor 2 and Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger proteins (76% and 83%, respectively; p < 0.05). However, the L and C groups showed similar in vivo hemodynamic parameters of cardiac function. In conclusion, short-term NOS inhibition determines an increased expression of Ca(2+) regulatory proteins, which contributes to improving cardiomyocyte contractile function, preserving left ventricular function.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".