Les PME dans le commerce extérieur français : d'une proximité régionale à une proximité de délai
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Généralement considérées comme introverties face aux échanges internationaux, les PME paraissent plus actives dans une approche régionale du commerce extérieur. Les échanges extérieurs des régions françaises subissent un effet de frontière contrasté. La proximité économique avec les pays partenaires intervient autant sinon plus que la position géographique des régions. Dans les régions où les échanges sont denses, les grandes entreprises sont les plus extraverties, mais les PME ne sont pas exclues des flux internationaux. La sous-traitance internationale de perfectionnement bénéficie aux PME de type industriel, souvent bien insérées dans le tissu économique régional. Aujourd’hui, la proximité de délai tend à supplanter la proximité de lieu. Plutôt que du statut frontalier, l’avenir des échanges extérieurs des régions dépend dès lors des réseaux de PME présents dans les districts industriels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".