MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067963177 · doi:10.1111/1540-5982.t01-1-00001

The retirement incentive effects of Canada's Income Security programs

2003· article· en· W2067963177 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRetirement, Disability, and Employment
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWelfare economicsPolitical scienceSocial securityEarningsIncentiveEconomicsFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Canada has a large Income Security system for retirement that provides significant and widely varying disincentives to work at older ages. We provide an empirical analysis of the retirement incentives of the Canadian Income Security system using a new administrative database. We find that the work disincentives inherent in the Canadian Income Security system have significant impacts on retirement. This suggests that program reform can play a role in responses to fiscal pressures. We also demonstrate the importance of controlling for lifetime earnings in retirement models. Specifications without these controls overestimate the effects of the Income Security system. JEL Classification: H55, J26 Les effets d’incitation à la retraite des programmes de la sécurité du revenu au Canada Le Canada a un important système de sécurité du revenu après retraite qui crée des désincitations importantes et diverses au travail pour les gens d’un âge avancé. Les auteurs donnent des résultats d’une analyse empirique de ces incitations en utilisant certaines données administratives nouvelles. Il semble que ces désincitations au travailont un impact significatif sur les décisions de retraite. Voilà qui suggère qu’une réforme des programmes peut avoir un impact important sur les réactions aux pressions fiscales. On montre aussi que la prise en compte des revenus tout au long de lavie active a une grande importance dans les modèles de retraite. Il est clair que toutes les spécifications de modèles qui ne prennent pas en compte ces facteurs tendent à sur‐estimer les effets des programmes de la sécurité du revenu.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.412
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.169
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.089 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it