Biotrophic mycoparasitic interactions between <i>Sphaerodes mycoparasitica</i> and phytopathogenic <i>Fusarium</i> species
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The objective of this study was to investigate the relationships between the biotrophic mycoparasite Sphaerodes mycoparasitica and pathogenic Fusarium strains. To study the interactions between S. mycoparasitica and four different phytopathogenic Fusarium strains, macroscopic observations were performed using dual-culture assays and microscopic examinations in combination with light and fluorescent microscopy. Both macroscopic and microscopic techniques were also vital in determining the host specificity of S. mycoparasitica with F. avenaceum, F. oxysporum, F. proliferatum, and F. sporotrichioides. Our results suggest that S. mycoparasitica established haustorial contact with F. avenaceum and F. oxysporum. Data obtained from the dual-culture assay and parasitism interactions revealed that this newly described contact biotrophic mycoparasitic fungus was capable of reducing F. avenaceum and F. oxysporum linear growth and size of hyphal cells through infection and penetration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it