MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067969536 · doi:10.1002/prca.201100046

The salivary proteome: Challenges and perspectives

2011· review· en· W2067969536 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePROTEOMICS - CLINICAL APPLICATIONS · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSalivary Gland Disorders and Functions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaWestern University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsSalivaProteomeProteolysisSalivary ProteinsGingivitisSecretionBiologySalivary glandPhysiologyInternal medicineImmunologyMedicineBioinformaticsEndocrinologyBiochemistryEnzymeDentistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a brief overview of the salivary proteome but with an emphasis on the major challenges in protein identification and quantitation. Precautions are necessary to avoid proteolysis, deglycosylation and dephosphorylation of salivary proteins by microbial and host enzymes in saliva. Many proteins are differentially expressed in secretions from different salivary glands and their proportional contributions to saliva vary with the flow rate. The total protein concentration in the secretion from any one gland varies considerably, depending on factors such as flow rate, duration of stimulation, nature of the stimulus and circadian rhythms. Many plasma proteins enter saliva via gingival crevicular fluid, of which there are increased amounts in persons with gingivitis or periodontal disease. These factors must be taken into account in the identification of potential biomarkers for different oral or systemic diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.988
Threshold uncertainty score0.897

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.290
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.137 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it