MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2067974441 · doi:10.1159/000078558

The effect of cold storage on recombination frequencies in human male testicular cells

2004· article· en· W2067974441 on OpenAlexafffund
Fei Sun, Kiril Trpkov, Alfred Rademaker, Edmund Ko, Leona Barclay, M. Mikhaail-Philips, Renée H. Martin

Bibliographic record

VenueCytogenetic and Genome Research · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalRockyview General HospitalUniversity of Calgary
FundersCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMeiosisBiologySynaptonemal complexMLH1RecombinationHomologous recombinationPloidyGeneticsChromosomeGenetic recombinationHomologous chromosomeSpermAndrologyDNADNA repairDNA mismatch repairGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meiotic recombination is essential for the segregation of homologous chromosomes and formation of normal haploid gametes. Decreased recombination is associated with the production of aneuploid sperm in humans. MLH1, a DNA mismatch repair protein, was recently found to mark the sites of recombination in humans. Newly developed immunofluorescence techniques to identify MLH1 foci on synaptonemal complexes (SCs) in pachytene cells from testicular tissue have opened up a new avenue of research on meiotic recombination. Future studies on normal and abnormal recombination in early meiosis will further research in human reproduction and genetics. However, the availability of testicular material will always be a major limiting factor in this kind of study. In order to obtain an adequate number of samples and samples of particular research interest, it is often of benefit to obtain samples from distant regions. Therefore, it is necessary to determine whether the quality of samples and accuracy of MLH1 frequencies change after transporting testicular samples from a distance. In the present study, we examined the recombination frequencies (numbers of MLH1 foci using immunofluorescence techniques) in 6 normal testicular samples. Each sample was split and analyzed in the fresh state and after storage on ice for two days, mimicking overnight courier air transport. The results showed no significant difference in the quality of the SC preparations or in the number of MLH1 foci between these two groups. These results demonstrate that testicular specimens may be shipped on ice without compromising data on chromosome pairing and recombination in early meiosis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCytogenetic and Genome ResearchSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207