MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068055008 · doi:10.1121/1.4780909

Development of a fresh-water tank facility for calibrating multibeam sonar

2003· article· en· W2068055008 on OpenAlexaff
Kenneth C. Baldwin, Larry A. Mayer, Andrew McLeod, Kenneth G. Foote, Dezhang Chu, Jonathan Beaudoin

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater Quality Monitoring Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCalibrationSonarAcousticsRepeatabilityTransducerComputer sciencePosition (finance)Table (database)Angular displacementPhysicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Multibeam sonars are being used increasingly to image fish. To realize their quantitative potential for measuring the numerical density of fish and other aquatic organisms, it is essential that they be calibrated. This can be done by the use of standard targets or reference hydrophones. The calibration of narrow beam acoustic arrays requires precision angular positioning of the transducer under test. This precision is defined as 0.1 deg of angular position control. This degree of control is achievable with the use of a precision rotary table typically used in CNC machining. This presentation describes: system specifications and the LabView program used to control and coordinate position and acoustic data acquisition, the initial evaluation of the rotary table for repeatability and possible backlash, and representative acoustic measurements made with multibeam sonars using the new system. [Work supported by NSF Contract No. OCE 0002842.]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.340

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaSame topicWater Quality Monitoring TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207