MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068057236 · doi:10.1021/ef010124c

Kinetics of Solvent Interactions with Asphaltenes during Coke Formation

2001· article· en· W2068057236 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAsphalteneChemistryTetralinSolventCrackingNaphthaleneCokeOrganic chemistrySolubilityChemical reactionChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The formation of coke from asphaltenes during thermal cracking is significantly affected by both reactions with the liquid components and the solvent properties of the liquid medium. The roles of both solubility phenomena and chemical reactions were studied by reacting Athabasca asphaltenes in a closed batch reactor at 430 °C. Reactions of asphaltene in maltene at different concentrations and reactions in a series of aromatic solvents (1-methyl naphthalene, naphthalene, and tetralin) were used to investigate the role of solvent properties and hydrogen donation reactions. The most important characteristics of the liquid phase were hydrogen donating ability and the ability to initiate cracking reactions. The latter mechanism was confirmed by adding n -dodecyl sulfide as an initiator compound. A modified kinetic model for coke formation, incorporating phase separation and hydrogen transfer to the asphaltenes, was consistent with the experimental results over a range of asphaltene concentrations and solvent conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.302

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it