MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Quercetin-Supplemented Diets Lower Blood Pressure and Attenuate Cardiac Hypertrophy in Rats With Aortic Constriction

2006· article· en· W2068066319 on OpenAlexaff
Thunder Jalili, Justin Carlstrom, Sun Kim, David J. Freeman, Huifeng Jin, Tzu-Ching Wu, Sheldon E. Litwin, J. David Symons

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineConstrictionInternal medicineBlood pressureMuscle hypertrophyQuercetinEndocrinologyCardiac function curveElectrical impedance myographyCardiologyChemistryVasodilationAntioxidantHeart failureBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quercetin (Q), a flavonoid found in berries and onions, can reduce blood pressure in hypertensive animals and inhibit signal transduction pathways in vitro that regulate cardiac hypertrophy. We hypothesized that quercetin could prevent cardiovascular complications in rats with abdominal aortic constriction (AAC). Rats consumed standard or Q-supplemented chow (1.5 g Q/kg chow) for 7 days before AAC or sham surgery (SHAM, n = 15; AAC, n = 15; SHAMQ, n = 15; AACQ, n = 14). Fourteen days after surgery, plasma and liver Q concentrations were elevated (P < 0.05) and hepatic lipid oxidation was reduced (P < 0.05) in Q-treated versus untreated rats. Carotid arterial blood pressure and cardiac hypertrophy were attenuated (P < 0.05), and cardiac protein kinase C betaII translocation was normalized (P < 0.05) in AACQ versus AAC. Expression of cardiac beta-myosin heavy-chain mRNA was also reduced in AACQ versus AAC (P < 0.05). However, extracellular regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation was similar in AAC versus AACQ. The level of aortic endothelial dysfunction (wire myography) was also similar between AAC and AACQ, in spite of reduced aortic thickening in AACQ. Importantly, Q-treated rats did not show any deleterious changes in myocardial function (echocardiography). Our data supports an antihypertensive and antihypertrophic effect of Q in vivo in the absence of changes concerning vascular and myocardial function.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.444
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations112
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cardiovascular PharmacologySame topicNitric Oxide and Endothelin EffectsFrench-language works237,207