MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068128406 · doi:10.1515/mamm.2004.003

Suckling attempts during winter by two non-filial Steller sea lion pups (<i>Eumetopias jubatus</i>)

2004· article· en· W2068128406 on OpenAlexaff
Boyd Porter, Andrew W. Trites

Bibliographic record

VenueMammalia · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine animal studies overview
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersAlaska Department of Fish and Game
KeywordsPaternal careBiologySea lionFisheryZoologyPregnancyOffspring

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Milk stealing and fostering care is rare among mammals (Packer et al . 1992). Such behaviour can benefit neonates and possibly the nursing foster mother (Roulin 2002, 2003). However, it also likely comes at a cost to the fostering mother and her dependent young. Neonates may increase their chances of survival by sneak-suckling unrelated females, or by obtaining milk with the consent of mothers of other neonates. However, chances are greater that females protective of their limited milk resources will aggressively prevent unrelated young from suckling. Risks of being bitten, attacked or killed by adult females presumably outweigh the potential benefits that might be achieved by sneak-suckling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.248
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMammaliaSame topicMarine animal studies overviewFrench-language works237,207