MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068170206 · doi:10.1504/ijvp.2013.057793

Advanced effective road profile filter for a rigid ring tyre quarter-vehicle model

2013· article· en· W2068170206 on OpenAlexaff
James R. Allen suffix II suffix, Moustafa El Gindy

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Vehicle Performance · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Dynamics and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsOntario Tech University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDeflection (physics)AccelerationFinite element methodVertical deflectionEngineeringStructural engineeringFilter (signal processing)Automotive engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the development and integration of an advanced effective road profile filter with an in-plane rigid ring tyre quarter-vehicle model. This novel fully integrated model improves upon the standard twin-cam effective road profile filter developed by taking into account the effects of vertical loading on tyre deflection and contact length; the model developed herein is said to be a force-dependent effective road profile (FDERP) rigid ring quarter-vehicle model (RRQVM) because the effective road shape parameters are treated as functions of the vertical contact force at each integration time step. The model is capable of simulating the dynamic response of a free rolling tyre over arbitrarily uneven road surfaces. The RRQVM is validated with tyre spindle vertical acceleration data from virtual finite element analysis (FEA) quarter-vehicle model (QVM) tests. A baseline in-plane RRQVM with a standard – force-independent effective road profile (FIERP) – twin-cam effective road profile filter is also developed for comparison with the FDERP RRQVM. Results for a described durability test event show that the FDERP RRQVM predicts the vertical tyre spindle acceleration more accurately than the FIERP RRQVM.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.343
Threshold uncertainty score0.618

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Vehicle PerformanceSame topicVehicle Dynamics and Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207