MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068199052 · doi:10.1029/2007eo090006

Satellites to study geomagnetic storms

2007· article· en· W2068199052 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Mohi Kumar

Bibliographic record

VenueEos · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMagnetosphereGeomagnetic stormEarth's magnetic fieldSolar windIonosphereSpacecraftAtmosphere (unit)StormMeteorologySpace weatherEnvironmental scienceGeophysicsAtmospheric sciencesPhysicsAstronomyMagnetic field

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

NASA's Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms (THEMIS) mission to study geomagnetic substorms over the next two years launched on 17 February from Cape Canaveral Air Force Station, Fla. Substorms are visible in the atmosphere as a sudden brightening of polar auroral ribbons as they split and reorganize, and are thought to form when solar wind overloads the magnetosphere with too much energy. Substorms are closely related to space storms that can disable spacecraft, communications and navigation systems, and power grids and that can expose astronauts to high energy free electrons. Launched from a single rocket, THEMIS's five satellites will align themselves between the Sun and the Earth to view substorms; simultaneously, ground stations in Alaska and Canada will monitor auroral dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.743
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEosSame topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamicsFrench-language works237,207