MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068206267 · doi:10.1109/pesgm.2014.6939051

Performance analysis of a real-time decentralized algorithm for coordinated PEV charging at home and workplace with PV solar panel integration

2014· article· en· W2068206267 on OpenAlexaff
Intissar Harrabi, Martin Maier

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Vehicles and Infrastructure
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemComputer scienceRenewable energyGridVehicle-to-gridBenchmark (surveying)Solar powerElectric vehicleAlgorithmAutomotive engineeringPower (physics)Distributed computingEngineeringElectrical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several studies dealt with grid-to-vehicle (G2V) and vehicle-to-grid (V2G) concepts emphasizing the importance of the integration of renewable energy sources (RESs). However, none has simultaneously evolved V2G, G2V and RES integration by simulating a real-time decentralized algorithm. Unlike previous work, our approach contributes to the coordination of plug-in electric vehicle (PEV) charging (G2V) and discharging (V2G) according to power generation while at the same time integrating photovoltaic (PV) solar panels at workplaces by proposing a real-time decentralized vehicle/grid algorithm, where PEVs can consume power from and supply stored power to the grid. The integration of PV solar panels to locally charge PEVs plays a major role in limiting the stress on grid demand. From the power perspective, our real-time decentralized algorithm shows superior performance in terms of peak shaving and minimizing system losses. The communication results indicate an efficient delay reduction and lower throughput compared to a benchmark centralized algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectric Vehicles and InfrastructureFrench-language works237,207