MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068272961 · doi:10.1097/inf.0b013e3182717f0b

Neonatal Herpes Simplex Virus Infections in Israel

2012· article· en· W2068272961 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Amir Koren, Diana Tasher, Michal Stein, Orit Yossepowitch, Eli Somekh

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHerpesvirus Infections and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirologyHerpes simplex virusMedicineVirus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The incidence and the clinical characteristics of neonatal herpes simplex virus (NHSV) infection in Israel are unknown. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records of NHSV cases who were born between January 2001 and December 2007 in 5 medical centers located in central Israel. Cases were identified using International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision codes. In addition, parents of survivors were interviewed by telephone. RESULTS: In the 8-year study period, 22 cases of NHSV were identified (an incidence rate of 8.4 per 100,000 live births). Most patients (77.2%, 17 cases) manifested as skin, eye and/or mouth infection, 13.6% (3 cases) as localized central nervous system disease and 9.1% (2 cases) as disseminated disease. Most (76.4%) herpes viruses typed in our series were HSV-1. None of the mothers had documented intrapartum visible genital HSV lesions or a previous history of genital herpes. Ritual circumcision was the source of HSV-1 transmission in 7 infants (31.8% of cases). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of NHSV infection in Israel was found to be similar to the lower part of the scale reported in the United States, however higher than the incidence reported in Canada or in Europe. Similar to more recent reports, our series demonstrates the shift toward the predominance of HSV-1 in NHSV infection. In addition, none of the mothers in our series had a previous history of genital herpes. This study emphasizes the need for awareness of HSV infection in Israeli neonates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Pediatric Infectious Disease JournalSame topicHerpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207