MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068323085 · doi:10.1139/s06-025

Acetylene blockage technique as a tool to determine denitrification potential of a biomass fixed on an organic media treating wastewater

2006· article· en· W2068323085 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yann Le Bihan, Paul Lessard

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Engineering and Science · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDenitrifying bacteriaBiofilterDenitrificationBiomass (ecology)AcetyleneWastewaterEnvironmental scienceAnoxic watersNitrous oxideEnvironmental chemistryPulp and paper industryChemistryEnvironmental engineeringNitrogenEcologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Biofiltration on organic media is used in many wastewater applications. However, no tools are available to survey the microorganisms' activity inside the process. The acetylene blockage technique was adapted to evaluate the potential denitrifiers' activity. The objectives of this work were to adapt and verify the applicability of the method by evaluating its sensitivity and variability. A closed cell was built and installed in an open network where pure gaseous nitrogen and acetylene had been successively injected at fixed rate on filtering media samples. N 2 O produced by the denitrifying biomass was monitored during the test. Assays were realized in replicates, with different quantities of filtering media, to observe the sensitivity and the variability of the method. Potential denitrifying activity and quantity of biomass correlation shows that the adapted method was sensitive for 50 to 150 g (wet basis) of filtering media. Moreover, when under an acetylene atmosphere, the coefficients of variation observed for the tests varied between 10% and 32% when under anoxic conditions. This work shows that the technique as adapted could be used as a tool to survey the potential activity of denitrifiers fixed on an organic media.Key words: denitrification, biofilter, acetylene, nitrous oxide, organic media, potential activity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.485

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Engineering and ScienceSame topicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen RemovalFrench-language works237,207