Modern management of lymphocyte predominant <scp>H</scp>odgkin lymphoma
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) represents 5% of all Hodgkin lymphoma and has distinct clinico-pathological features. It is typified by the presence of lymphocyte predominant cells, which are CD20(+) , CD15(-) and CD30(-) and are found scattered amongst small B-lymphocytes arranged in a nodular pattern. Patients typically are males presenting with localized, peripheral lymphadenopathy. Despite frequent and often late or multiple relapses the prognosis is favourable. Deaths due to NLPHL are uncommon, but secondary malignancies and other treatment toxicities contribute appreciably to overall mortality. Secondary aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma can occur in approximately 7-14% of cases of NLPHL. Given this diseases' rarity, the optimal management is unclear and opinions differ as to whether treatment paradigms should be similar to or differ from those for classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This review provides an overview of the existing literature describing of the outcome and treatment approaches for limited and advanced stage NLPHL.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".