Evaluation of adsorption and coagulation as membrane pretreatment steps for the removal of organic material and disinfection-by-product precursors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adsorption using powdered activated carbon and coagulation using polyaluminium chloride or aluminum sulphate were investigated as pretreatment steps prior to membrane filtration to remove organic material and trihalomethane (THM) precursors contained in a raw drinking water source. Ultrafiltration and microfiltration membrane treatment alone could not effectively and consistently remove organic material, measured as total organic carbon, and THM precursors, measured as chloroform formation potential, contained in the raw water. Coagulation, prior to membrane treatment, significantly improved the removal of organic material and THM precursors contained in the raw water. Microfiltration membrane treatment, with pre-coagulation, consistently removed approximately 75% of the organic material and the THM precursors contained in the raw water. A coagulant concentration of approximately 0.3 mg/L, as Al, was sufficient to achieve this high removal efficiency. Adsorption, prior to membrane treatment, did not significantly improve the removal of organic material or THM precursors. Key words: adsorption, chloroform, coagulation, disinfection-by-products, drinking water treatment, microfiltration, trihalomethanes, ultrafiltration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".