MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068384014 · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/56/1/032

Linearity and image uniformity of the Vista<sup>TM</sup>optical cone beam scanner

2006· article· en· W2068384014 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Kevin Jordan, Jerry Battista

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physics Conference Series · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Canadian institutionsLondon Health Sciences CentreWestern University
FundersCancer Care Ontario
KeywordsScannerCollimated lightOpticsDetectorDosimetryBeam (structure)Cone beam computed tomographyPhysicsMedical physicsMaterials scienceNuclear medicineComputed tomographyMedicineRadiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Several optical computed tomography (CT) scanner geometries have been demonstrated for application to 3D gel dosimetry. The scanners fall into two classes: single-ray detector and broad beam - array detector. Two broad beam geometries, divergent cone beam and collimated beam are posssible and each geometry has features worth evaluating. This report is an initial evaluation of the VistaTM optical cone beam scanner (Modus Medical Devices, London Canada). Results from this first research model will assist is identifying improvements required to make a system for accurate clinical 3D gel dosimetry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.631
Threshold uncertainty score0.446

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physics Conference SeriesSame topicAdvanced Radiotherapy TechniquesFrench-language works237,207