MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Plexin-B2 Regulates the Proliferation and Migration of Neuroblasts in the Postnatal and Adult Subventricular Zone

2012· article· en· W2068445328 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Bhaskar Saha, Athéna R. Ypsilanti, Camille Boutin, Harold Cremer, Alain Chédotal

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicAxon Guidance and Neuronal Signaling
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaFondation Fyssen
KeywordsSubventricular zoneRostral migratory streamNeuroblastOlfactory bulbNeurogenesisBiologyPlexinNeuroscienceCell biologyForebrainNeural stem cellStem cellAxon guidanceCentral nervous systemAxon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the postnatal forebrain, the subventricular zone (SVZ) contains a pool of undifferentiated cells, which proliferate and migrate along the rostral migratory stream (RMS) to the olfactory bulb and differentiate into granule cells and periglomerular cells. Plexin-B2 is a semaphorin receptor previously known to act on neuronal proliferation in the embryonic brain and neuronal migration in the cerebellum. We show here that, in the postnatal and adult CNS, Plexin-B2 is expressed in the subventricular zone lining the telencephalic ventricles and in the rostral migratory stream. We analyzed Plxnb2(-/-) mice and found that there is a marked reduction in the proliferation of SVZ cells in the mutant. Plexin-B2 expression is downregulated in the olfactory bulb as interneurons initiate radial migration. BrdU labeling and GFP electroporation into postnatal SVZ, in addition to time-lapse videomicroscopy, revealed that neuroblasts deficient for Plexin-B2 migrate faster than control ones and leave the RMS more rapidly. Overall, these results show that Plexin-B2 plays a role in postnatal neurogenesis and in the migration of SVZ-derived neuroblasts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.510
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations60
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of NeuroscienceSame topicAxon Guidance and Neuronal SignalingFrench-language works237,207