A Carbon-13 and Deuterium NMR Investigation of Solid Platinum−Ethylene Complexes: Zeise's Salt and Pt(η<sup>2</sup>-C<sub>2</sub>H<sub>4</sub>)(PPh<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The carbon chemical shift (CS) tensors for two platinum−ethylene complexes, ethylene- 13 C 2 -bis(triphenylphosphine)platinum(0) and potassium trichloro(ethylene- 13 C 2 )platinate(II), have been characterized by the dipolar-chemical shift method and with 2D spin−echo NMR experiments. The carbon CS tensors of the ethylene ligand are significantly modified upon coordination with platinum, particularly for the Pt(0) complex, to which ethylene is strongly coordinated. The most shielded principal component, δ 33, perpendicular to the molecular plane in ethylene, is relatively unaffected by coordination; the changes to the CS tensors arise mainly from the increased shielding in the directions corresponding to δ 11 and δ 22 . Hence, the span of the chemical shift tensor decreases from 210 ppm for ethylene (Zilm, K. W.; Conlin, R. T.; Grant, D. M.; Michl, J. J. Am. Chem. Soc . 1980, 102, 6672) to 150 ppm for the Pt(II) complex, and to 48 and 55 ppm, respectively, for the two nonequivalent carbon nuclei of the Pt(0) complex. The orientations of the carbon CS tensor components relative to the 13 C, 13 C dipolar vector are also determined from this analysis. Orientations of the carbon CS tensors in the molecular framework are proposed on the basis of a combination of the experimental results and ab initio calculations using the GIAO method. Deuterium NMR studies of the ethylene- 2 H 4 derivatives of the title compounds are characterized by long 2 H T 1 s and by quadrupolar coupling constants which are comparable in magnitude to that observed for rigid olefins, demonstrating that the ethylene ligand is not subject to significant motion. This conclusion is supported by ab initio calculations which indicate barriers to internal rotation for the ethylene ligand in excess of 80 kJ mol -1 in both complexes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".