MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068451773 · doi:10.1143/jjap.40.4378

A Step Toward Making and Wiring Up Molecular-Scale Devices

2001· article· en· W2068451773 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJapanese Journal of Applied Physics · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMolecular Junctions and Nanostructures
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMiniaturizationKey (lock)NanotechnologyComputer scienceElectronicsElectronic circuitDreamScale (ratio)Electrical engineeringMaterials scienceEngineeringPhysicsComputer securityNeurosciencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For over two decades scientists have been exploring ideas for creating “molecular electronic” devices. The aim has been to make functional units consisting of a very small number of molecules, perhaps only one molecule, that are capable of switching a current. Many such elements could then be combined to create computers and other electronic circuits. The hope has been that this approach will lead to the ultimate miniaturization of devices as well as to optimal operating efficiency and the lowest cost. While this scenario remains little more than a dream, some key steps have recently been made. Here, I outline some background information, and as well, briefly review some recent developments from our lab.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.082
Threshold uncertainty score0.434

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it