Ex vivo magnetic resonance microscopy of an osteochondral transfer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A 49-year-old woman with right knee pain and a chondral defect on the medial femoral condyle underwent an osteochondral transfer. The patient initially had pain relief, but then sustained a twisting injury and had progressive chondromalacia and pain on the affected side. She subsequently underwent a total knee replacement, and the tissue from the osteochondral transfer (OATS) site was harvested for analysis. In vitro MR microimaging of the excised joint segment revealed undamaged, full-thickness cartilage on the OATS plug, intact cartilage on the posterior condyle, and severely thinned and damaged cartilage on the anterior condyle. Alcian blue-stained sections revealed that proteoglycans were present throughout the OATS core but were nearly absent in the native cartilage. Quantitative T(1) data acquired after equilibration with Gd-DTPA indicated a distribution of matrix fixed charge in the OATS plug and anterior tissue that agreed well with histology and literature observations, while the posterior native cartilage appeared to have fixed charge similar to that of the OATS tissue. Histology revealed poor graft integration between OATS and native cartilage, with a distinct layer of fibrous tissue at the posterior interface. MRI images, by comparison, showed a hypointense feature at the posterior interface but uniform intensity across the anterior interface. Quantitative T(2), magnetization transfer and T(1) data acquired with and without gadolinium contrast showed dependences on depth, location, and pathology that were consistent with measurements reported in the literature for articular cartilage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".