MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2068478129 · doi:10.1190/1.2370035

Stabilizing explicit frequency‐space migration using local WKBJ operators

2006· article· en· W2068478129 on OpenAlexaff
Chad M. Hogan, Gary F. Margravé

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace (punctuation)Computer scienceControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We introduce a new operator for explicit wavefield extrapolation. We modify the commonly used locally homogeneous wavefield extrapolator to include a local vertical gradient, whose purpose is simply to enhance operator stability when spatially localized. The locally homogeneous operator assumes that wavefield extrapolation across a single depth step can be done with straight raypaths using the assumed constant velocity at the output point. Such operators can produce excellent seismic images but the straight ray assumption means that their spatial aperture is infinite, which leads to instability when the operator is localized by spatial windowing. Adjusting the operator to accommodate a suitably chosen positive vertical velocity gradient causes raypath curvature which naturally limits the operator within a finite aperture. The required modification to the locally homogeneous operator is essentially a WKBJ-style integrated phase. The resulting operator has a finite aperture and is sufficiently stable when localized to be used in an explicit depth migration scheme. We demonstrate operator fidelity with excellent images of the Marmousi model.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques→French-language works237,207→