Bibliographic record
Abstract
A wavefront-generated simulator for Canada-France-Hawaii (CFH) 3.6-m telescope to test a novel wide-field IR camera (WIRCAM) of the telescope is presented. We investigate a Computer-Generated Hologram (CGH) wavefront generator to demonstrate off-axis aberrated wavefront generation with and with no rotational symmetry modes of Zernike polynomial as telescope wavefront simulator. A CGH simulator system to generate field optical performance of CFH telescope, while working on a F/3.8 prima focus with an field-of-view (FOV) of ±15 arcmin, is designed and computed for WIRCAM tests in optical labs for system performance evaluation. The CGH simulator is modeled as a diffractive surface defined by a phase function, and the optical phase function is specified by a Zernike polynomial phase equation. As the CGH simulator has to work in the first diffraction order, a carrier frequency must be added to the phase function in such a way to ensure the separation of the diffraction orders for eliminating unwanted light in the WIRCAM tests. Finally the nominal-design performance of the CGH simulator is compared with the tolerance analysis predictions as well as the system misalignment sensitivity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".