Influence of Osmotic Pressure Changes on the Opening of Existing Cracks in 2 Intervertebral Disc Models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In Brief Study Design. An experimental hydrogel model and a numerical mixture model were used to investigate why the disc herniates while osmotic pressure is decreasing. Objective. To investigate the influence of decreasing osmotic pressure on the opening of cracks in the disc. Summary of Background Data. In the degeneration process, the disc changes structure (i.e., cracks occur, and osmotic pressure decreases). Disc herniation typically develops when hydration declines, but, on the other hand, it is said that the anulus of a highly hydrated disc has a high risk of rupture. We hypothesized that disc herniation is preceded by the opening of cracks as a result of decreasing osmotic pressure. Methods. The osmotic pressure was changed in hydrogel samples with a crack, which was visualized with a confocal laser scanning microscope (Zeiss, Göttingen, Germany). A 2-dimensional finite element mixture model simulated a decrease in osmotic pressure around a crack in a swelling material. Results. Experiments and simulations show that a decrease in osmotic pressure results in the opening of cracks. The simulations show high effective stress concentrations around the crack tip, while the overall stress level decreases, indicating an increased risk of crack growth. Conclusions. Decreasing osmotic pressure in a degenerating intervertebral disc enhances the opening of existing cracks, despite the concomitant decrease in anular stresses. Experiments on hydrogel samples and 2-dimensional finite element simulations with a 4-component mixture model show that cracks in a degenerating intervertebral disc open as a result of decreasing osmotic pressure. This process could eventually lead to intervertebral disc herniation, despite the concomitant decrease in tissue stresses.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".