MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068565340 · doi:10.1021/jp405120u

Small Platinum Cluster Hydrides in the Gas Phase

2013· article· en· W2068565340 on OpenAlexaff
Christian Kerpal, Dan J. Harding, D. M. Rayner, André Fielicke

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry A · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council Canada
FundersStichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der MaterieDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
KeywordsHydrideChemistryPlatinumDissociation (chemistry)HydrogenHydrogen atomDensity functional theoryMoleculePhysical chemistryInfrared spectroscopySpectroscopyCluster (spacecraft)Bond-dissociation energyBinding energyCrystallographyComputational chemistryAtomic physicsCatalysisOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The reactions of small cationic platinum clusters (Pt2(+)-Pt7(+)) with molecular hydrogen were investigated, and the structures of the hydride complexes were analyzed using IR spectroscopy. We determined the relative reaction rates for the addition of the first H2 molecule to the platinum clusters, and we report the hydrogen saturation coverages observed at high H2 concentration. High H atom per Pt atom ratios were observed, similar to earlier measurements on other group-10 transition metals. The structures of the fully saturated complexes of Pt2(+)-Pt5(+) were investigated using a combination of infrared multiple-photon dissociation (IR-MPD) spectroscopy in the frequency range of 550-2050 cm(-1) and density functional theory-based calculations. We found molecularly bound hydrogen alongside bridge and often atop binding of hydrogen atoms for all of the low-energy structures, in contrast to earlier theoretical predictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.324

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry ASame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207