Structures rythmiques dans Le passage de l’Indiana : ressacs et dérives du sens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les théories du rythme en poésie contemporaine mettent en lumière la construction formelle du Passage de l’Indiana de Normand Chaurette. Structurée à la manière d’une partition musicale, la pièce fonctionne selon un système de répétitions qui instaure une temporalité favorisant les retours. En repérant et en comparant des unités signifiantes (répliques, thèmes et motifs) qui sont répétées dans la pièce, il appert que le sens de ces unités se transforme selon l’endroit où elles se situent. L’intrigue qui paraît, de premier abord, fragmentée et stagnante en raison des multiples répétitions progresse, au contraire, grâce aux déplacements de sens qu’implique la reproduction. Ces déplacements se vérifient également chez les personnages : chacun répète les répliques des autres personnages et leur attribue un sens nouveau en jouant un autre rôle. Grâce au jeu dans le jeu, l’identité des personnages est mouvante.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.006 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".