MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068630826 · doi:10.1179/026708404225010603

Electrochemical Preparation of Ni and Fe Hydroxide/Oxide Films Using Polyethylenimine

2004· article· en· W2068630826 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueSurface Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrophoretic Deposition in Materials Science
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPolyethylenimineHydroxideMaterials scienceElectrophoretic depositionThermogravimetric analysisElectrochemistryMetal hydroxideIntercalation (chemistry)Deposition (geology)OxideElectrolyteInorganic chemistryChemical engineeringNanocompositeMetalElectrodeMetallurgyNanotechnologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Composite films consisting of Fe hydroxide, Ni hydroxide and polyethylenimine (PEI) were obtained by the combined electrolytic-electrophoretic deposition method. The proposed method for PEI charging and deposition is based on the use of cationic polymer-metal ion complexes. Cathodic deposits were obtained on Pt and Ag substrates. By varying both the concentration of PEI in solutions and the deposition time, the amount of material deposited and its composition can be varied. The method was used to fabricate NiFe 2 O 4 films. The deposits were studied by thermogravimetric analysis, X-ray diffraction analysis and SEM. The mechanism of electrochemical intercalation of PEI into hydroxide deposits is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.212
Threshold uncertainty score0.697

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it