MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068647484 · doi:10.1061/41171(401)28

Challenges of Retrofitting an Existing Domed Stadium with a New Retractable Roof—BC Place Stadium, Vancouver, BC

2011· article· en· W2068647484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David M. Campbell, Karen A. Lynch

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2011 · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStadiumRoofTrussRetrofittingEngineeringCivil engineeringJoint (building)Structural engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BC Place Stadium in Vancouver, BC opened in 1983 as the first domed stadium in Canada covered by the largest air-supported roof in the world. As part of a major revitalization project the stadium dome is being replaced with a new retractable roof structure. The new roof, designed and engineered by an international team, is under construction with completion scheduled in late 2011. The new roof, designed for the 1 in 100 year snow and wind loads and current seismic requirements, is supported by the original stadium superstructure. The new roof structure is a post-tensioned radial cable truss, clad with tensile membrane with a center retracting pneumatic membrane. The paper presents features of the new roof and addresses some of the unique challenges encountered in this unprecedented project. While the challenges overcome in the roof construction, now nearing completion, are worthy and manifold, this paper is limited to roof design due to required brevity. The roof construction will hopefully merit future publication.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.314

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueStructures Congress 2011Same topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207