Dans quelles conditions est-il acceptable ou non de mourir par euthanasie ?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’opinion publique est de plus en plus favorable à la pratique de l’euthanasie dans un contexte de maladie incurable et de souffrances, ce qui constitue un argument prisé par les défenseurs de l’euthanasie. Cette étude démontre que la population québécoise y est majoritairement favorable, mais qu’une proportion importante émet des réserves dans d’autres contextes comme lorsque la personne ne souffre pas, lorsqu’il y a espoir de guérison, lorsque le motif de la demande est la souffrance psychologique ou morale, ou lorsque la personne est seulement très âgée. Selon les conditions de vie et de santé proposées, des caractéristiques sociodémographiques différentes semblent liées au fait de changer ou non d’opinion. D’autres études doivent être menées afin de mieux comprendre ce qui caractérise l’opinion de la population québécoise sur l’euthanasie et d’en suivre l’évolution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".