Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bradycardic states are associated with myocardial electrical remodeling predisposing to potentially lethal ventricular tachydysrhythmias. We used a novel model of complete heart block (CHB) in the rabbit to test the hypothesis that ventricular activation rate is the primary determinant of early bradycardic electrical remodeling. Chronic endocardial right ventricular demand (VVI) pacing was applied at either the near-physiologic rate of 280 beats/min or at the bradycardic rate of 140 beats/min, beginning immediately after transcatheter radiofrequency AV node ablation. A third group of animals underwent sham ablation and served as non-paced, normal sinus rhythm controls. The major finding of this study was that electrical remodeling was established within 8 days of CHB induction in the bradycardic animals, but was not observed in either of the other 2 groups. Bradycardic animals had significant QT interval prolongation and biventricular downregulation of the delayed rectifier K+ currents, IKr and IKs. The Ca2+-independent transient outward K+ current, I(to), and the inwardly rectifying K+ current, I(K1), were unaffected. This paper highlights these findings in the context of a literature-based review of heart rate-dependent remodeling of the mammalian myocardium, summarizing the current state of knowledge and describing future challenges.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".