MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068714011 · doi:10.1016/j.cld.2011.03.003

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Screening and Staging

2011· review· en· W2068714011 on OpenAlexaff
Morris Sherman

Bibliographic record

VenueClinics in Liver Disease · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHepatocellular carcinomaLiver cancerStage (stratigraphy)HomogeneousInternal medicineOncologyCarcinomaRadiologyLiver disease

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Active screening of patients at risk for HCC has led to the identification of early HCCs that are amenable to treatment with a high rate of cure. This requires high-quality ultrasound examinations at 6-month intervals. If widely applied, screening has the potential to substantially reduce the mortality from this disease. The application of the Barcelona Cancer of the Liver Clinic (BCLC) staging system should standardize assessment of prognosis and determination of the most effective treatments for each stage. With new molecular targeted agents coming, it is critical that studies are performed in patients stratified by stage into homogeneous groups. Because it is linked with therapy, the BCLC is ideally suited to this purpose.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.946
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.116 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations55
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinics in Liver DiseaseSame topicHepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisFrench-language works237,207