Design & Implementation of Real-time Parallel GA Operators on the IBM Cell Processor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present a set of single-core designed parallel SIMD Genetic Algorithm (GA) operators aimed at increasing computational speed of genetic algorithms. We use a discrete-valued chromosome representation. The explored operators include: single gene mutation, uniform crossover and a fitness evaluation function. We discuss their low-level hardware implementations on the Cell Processor. We use the Knapsack problem as a proof of concept, demonstrating performances of our operators. We measure the scalability in terms of generations per second. Using the architecture of the Cell Processor and a static population size of 648 individuals, we achieved 11.6 million generations per second on one Synergetic Processing Element (SPE) core for a problem size n = 8 and 9.5 million generations per second for a problem size n = 16. Generality for a problem size n multiple of 8 is also shown. Executing six independent concurrent GA runs, one per SPE core, allows for a rough overall estimate of 70 million generations per second and 57 million generations per second for problem sizes of n = 8 and n = 16 respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".