MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Health-promoting hospitals: a dream or reality?

2014· article· en· W2068720131 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lynn Hutchison, Jennifer E. Gallagher

Bibliographic record

VenueFaculty Dental Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicObesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInteractive kioskQuarter (Canadian coin)MedicinePopulationDreamMedical emergencyFamily medicineEnvironmental healthPsychologyGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There were 17.8 million finished consultant episodes in the year 2011–2012 in UK hospitals. 1 As well as the patients themselves, there are also relatives and friends that will visit hospitals and of course the hospital staff. Are we promoting health to this significant population? Or are we giving mixed messages, particularly in selling unhealthy food and drinks in our canteens, kiosks and vending machines? Are there healthy choices available? As recently as 1983, cigarettes were sold in a quarter of Wessex acute and maternity hospitals. 2 Nowadays this seems unthinkable. Is this different to selling sweets and sugary drinks in a dental hospital?

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.009
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.081

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0090.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0130.025
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0130.021
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.347
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFaculty Dental JournalSame topicObesity, Physical Activity, DietFrench-language works237,207