MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068721620 · doi:10.1139/f00-068

Changes in sediment viral and bacterial abundances with hypolimnetic oxygen depletion in a shallow eutrophic Lac Brome (Quebec, Canada)

2000· article· en· W2068721620 on OpenAlexfundvenueaboutno aff
Mahaut Ricciardi-Rigault, David F. Bird, Yves T. Prairie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicBacteriophages and microbial interactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersGroupe de recherche interuniversitaire en limnologie
KeywordsHypolimnionEutrophicationAbundance (ecology)BiologySedimentEcologyPopulationSedimentationIncubationMicrobial population biologyEnvironmental chemistryBacteriaChemistryNutrient

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Two studies were conducted to examine changes in sediment viral and bacterial abundances following hypolimnetic oxygen depletion. Both studies, a spatiotemporal field study and a core incubation experiment set under controlled conditions, demonstrated that bacterial and viral abundances decreased significantly (43-48% for bacteria and 36-38% for viruses) and in a nearly identical pattern when submitted to changes in the oxygen status of their milieu. The consistency of the results strongly suggests that the shift in both population densities is essentially caused by the onset of anoxia, either directly or indirectly. We suggest that the decline in abundance is due to the disappearance of strictly aerobic bacteria and their associated viruses and not due to stress-induced viral lysis. We also show that the P content of the lysed microbial community can represent an important source of P released from the sediments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.079
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2000
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicBacteriophages and microbial interactionsFrench-language works237,207