MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068750743 · doi:10.1128/jcm.01912-14

Instability of Aspergillus Galactomannan in Stored Clinical Samples

2014· letter· en· W2068750743 on OpenAlexaff
Simon F. Dufresne, Stéphanie Beauchemin, Christian Lavallée, Michél Laverdière

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Microbiology · 2014
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAntifungal resistance and susceptibility
Canadian institutionsHôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalactomannanAspergillusMicrobiologyAspergillosisFungi imperfectiBiologyMedicineImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We read with interest the recent paper by Wheat et al. ([1][1]) reporting on the long-term stability of Aspergillus galactomannan in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and serum specimens stored at −20°C. Their findings contrasted with previously published results from Johnson et al. ([2][2]),

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.133
GPT teacher head0.428
Teacher spread0.295 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical MicrobiologySame topicAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFrench-language works237,207