Internalization of Inactive EGF Receptor into Endosomes and the Subsequent Activation of Endosome-Associated EGF Receptors
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite intensive efforts to understand cell signaling from endosomes, there is no direct evidence demonstrating that endosomal signaling is sufficient to activate signal transduction pathways or that endosomal signaling can produce biological responses. The lack of breakthrough is due in part to the inability to generate endosomal signals in isolation from plasma membrane signals. In this Protocol, we describe a system in which epidermal growth factor (EGF) receptor (EGFR) is specifically activated when it is endocytosed into endosomes. We treated cells with EGF in the presence of AG1478, a specific EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and monensin, which blocks recycling of EGFR. This treatment led to the internalization of nonactivated EGF-EGFR complex into endosomes. The endosome-associated EGFR was then activated by removing AG1478 and monensin. During this procedure, we did not observe any detectable surface EGFR phosphorylation. We also achieved specific activation of endosome-associated EGFR without using monensin. Specific activation of endosome-associated EGFR provides a unique tool to study endosomal signaling of EGFR. This method may also be applied to other receptor tyrosine kinases to study whether they, too, can signal from endosomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".