MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068760355 · doi:10.1177/154193120004403013

Developing and Updating the Provincial Musculoskeletal Disorders Prevention Program

2000· article· en· W2068760355 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Julie Courville, Ketty M. Archer, Josée Sauvage

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)CommissionProcess (computing)Occupational safety and healthMedicineProcess managementMedical educationEngineeringComputer scienceBusinessGeographyPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In light of the growing number of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs), the Commission de la santé et de la sécurité du travail (CSST) of Québec has established a number of MSD guidelines. An inspection-prevention program was then developed to implement these guidelines. Throughout the program development process, the CSST relied on the cooperation of various occupational health and safety partners in Québec. An expert, participatory or mixed approach to ergonomics was used, depending on the organizational context, and the tools were adapted to suit each context. To ensure continuous improvement, the CSST has undertaken to update the program and tools. At the same time, the program continues to be assessed, a process which should be completed sometime during the year 2000.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.770
Threshold uncertainty score0.463

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0030.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual MeetingSame topicMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationFrench-language works237,207