MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068771337 · doi:10.1109/icme.2013.6607614

Extended touch user interfaces

2013· article· en· W2068771337 on OpenAlexaff
Tusi Chowdhury, Parham Aarabi, Weijian Zhou, Yuan Zhonglin, Kai Zou

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSpeech and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMicrophoneArtificial intelligenceFeature vectorClassifier (UML)Mobile devicePattern recognition (psychology)Computer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper explores an extended touch-based input interface for mobile devices by inferring the user-tapped location on any neighboring surface. We propose the feasibility of achieving a portable solution by using only the device microphone, without needing multiple sensors or highly specialized single piezoelectric sensor as has been done in past research. Training and classification of discrete tap locations is done using cross-correlation analysis on the audio feature vector. We first explore a binary classifier that performs pair-wise detection of taps, which results in a 92% detection rate across different surfaces. The solution is extended to multi-tap detection using a K-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithm trained on 17 output classes, resulting in 92% knuckle tap and 63% soft tap detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.911
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpeech and Audio ProcessingFrench-language works237,207