MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068813452 · doi:10.1109/icepe.2014.6970062

Aeration solution of water used by hydraulic turbines to respect the environmental policies

2014· article· en· W2068813452 on OpenAlexaff
Florentina Bunea, Diana Maria Bucur, Gabriel Dan Ciocan, Georgiana Dunca

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCavitation Phenomena in Pumps
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydropowerRenewable energyAerationEnvironmental scienceSustainable developmentWork (physics)Water qualityResource (disambiguation)Environmental economicsEnvironmental engineeringComputer scienceEngineeringEcologyWaste management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Preserving the quality of the water is a major concern from ecological, economical and sustainable development point of view, but also a condition when using water for renewable energy production. The European Water Policy defines a common regulation for sustainable and integrated management of water corps and requires that all impact factors to be considered. The environmental friendly concept represents a necessity for worldwide hydropower development. The dissolved oxygen in water courses represents an essential parameter which allows the preservation and development of aquatic habitat. The objective of the work is identification and study of a new solution which will contribute to improvement of the dissolved oxygen quantity in water used as renewable energy resource, so necessary to the aquatic life. The proposed solution takes in consideration the optimum between aeration parameters and energy consumption, in order to be implemented in hydraulic turbines

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCavitation Phenomena in PumpsFrench-language works237,207