MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068815957 · doi:10.1055/s-2001-15392

Equality of the Sexes: Mammalian Dosage Compensation

2001· review· en· W2068815957 on OpenAlex
Carolyn J. Brown

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSeminars in Reproductive Medicine · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsXISTX-inactivationDosage compensationSkewed X-inactivationX chromosomeBiologyGeneticsHeterochromatinChromosomeGene dosageGeneGene expression

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

X chromosome inactivation achieves dosage equivalence for most X-linked genes between the two X chromosomes in females and the single X chromosome in males. In this article the evidence for random inactivation of an X chromosome is reviewed, along with the exceptions that result in nonrandom inactivation. Another exception to X chromosome inactivation is the presence of genes that escape inactivation and are expressed from both the active and inactive X chromosomes. The phenotypic consequences of such expression from the inactive X chromosome are discussed. The major players in the process of inactivation are presented. Initiation of inactivation requires the functional RNA, XIST, and the subsequent stable inactivation of the X chromosome relies upon the recruitment of many other factors, the majority of which are generally associated with heterochromatin.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it