Effect of Dietary Sodium on Atrial Natriuretic Factor Released in Rats with Chronic Renal Failure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies were done in partially nephrectomized rats to examine the effect of dietary sodium intake on atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) released by the atria. Experiments were done in four groups of male Wistar rats. Group 1 (n = 10) and 3 (m = 10) rats were sham-operated. Group 2 and 4 were 5/6 nephrectomized. Group 1 and 2 were fed a sodium-supplemented diet. Group 3 and 4 received a sodium-deficient diet. Renal functions were similar between group 2 and 4. Plasma ANF level was raised in group 2 (182 +/- 17 pg/ml). Circulating ANF levels in group 1,3 and 4 were 95 +/- 5, 90 +/- 5 and 95 +/- 4 pg/ml, respectively. Atrial ANF contents were higher in partially nephrectomized rats after receiving a sodium-supplemented diet. A reduction in atrial ANF contents occurred when fed a sodium-deficient diet. In vitro studies were done to assess the rate of ANF released. ANF secretory rates were highest in group 2 (11 +/- 1.5 pg/min/mg). There was no difference between group 1,3 and 4. A positive correlation was found between plasma ANF and ANF released in all groups examined. Thus, plasma ANF levels were a good reflection of ANF secretory rates. A significant correlation existed between plasma ANF and sodium excretion in chronic renal failure rats (r = 0.78; p less than 0.01). A dissociation between plasma ANF and water excretion was seen. These results suggest that in chronic renal failure rats, ANF played a role in sodium adaptation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".