MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068865715 · doi:10.1177/0968344507078377

Colonization, Conquest, and the Supply of Food and Transport: The Reorganization of Logistics Management, 1780—1795

2007· article· en· W2068865715 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Roger Morriss

Bibliographic record

VenueWar in History · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRationalization (economics)CONQUESTSierra leoneColonialismEmpireHistorySri lankaNova scotiaEconomic historyEconomyAncient historyEngineeringPolitical scienceEthnologyArchaeologyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although in 1776—83 Britain failed to suppress its American colonists, the necessity to maintain an army across the Atlantic developed both the infrastructure and the experience needed to manage an empire. For it began a rationalization in the management of the supply of military food and transport that was completed in 1793—94 when the naval Victualling and Transport Boards undertook those responsibilities, and it built upon knowledge acquired in the supply of the Falklands garrison (1767—72) to permit the shipment after the war of colonists and supplies to Australia, Nova Scotia, and Sierra Leone. This infrastructure and experience provided the foundation for the great expeditions of the French Revolutionary War and the development of a global network of colonial garrisons during the Napoleonic War.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.152
Threshold uncertainty score0.303

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.010
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.181
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWar in HistorySame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207