The Effect of Vernakalant (RSD1235), an Investigational Antiarrhythmic Agent, on Atrial Electrophysiology in Humans
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To determine the acute effects of vernakalant (RSD1235) on electrophysiologic (EP) properties in humans. BACKGROUND: Vernakalant is an investigational mixed ion channel blocker that can terminate acute atrial fibrillation (AF) in humans at 2 to 5 mg/kg and may be more "atrial-selective" than available agents. METHODS: Patients (N=19; 53% male; age, 48+/-11 years) underwent EP study before and after 25 minutes of intravenous vernakalant administration: 2 mg/kg over 10 min+0.5 mg/kg/hr for 35 min or 4 mg/kg over 10 min+1 mg/kg/hr for 35 min. EP measurements, including atrial refractory period (AERP) and ventricular refractory period (VERP), were obtained. RESULTS: The lower dose prolonged AERP at 600, but not at 400 or 300 msec paced cycle length. The higher dose significantly prolonged AERP from 203+/-31 msec to 228+/-24 msec at 600 msec, 182+/-30 msec to 207+/-27 msec at 400 msec, and 172 msec+/-24 to 193+/-21 msec at 300 msec. There was no significant prolongation of VERP at either dose or at any cycle length. There was a small but significant prolongation of AV nodal refractoriness; Wenckebach cycle length prolonged by 18+/-12 msec (from baseline 343+/-54 msec) at the higher dose (P<0.05). Sinus node recovery time also increased by 123+/-158 msec (from baseline 928+/-237 msec) at the higher dose (P<0.05). There was a slight prolongation of QRS duration at the higher dose, during ventricular pacing at CL=400 msec (15+/-15 msec, P=0.0547). QT and HV intervals were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: At doses similar to those tested clinically, vernakalant dose-dependently prolonged atrial refractoriness, prolonged AV nodal conduction and refractoriness, and slightly prolonged QRS duration, but it had no effect on ventricular refractoriness.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".