MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068876973 · doi:10.1080/03610920601126225

A Vectorial Notion of Skewness and Its Use in Testing for Multivariate Symmetry

2007· article· en· W2068876973 on OpenAlexaff
N. Balakrishnan, M. R. Brito, Adolfo J. Quiróz

Bibliographic record

VenueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and Methods · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultivariate statisticsSkewnessStatisticMathematicsTest statisticStatisticsNonparametric statisticsNull distributionMultivariate analysisAsymptotic distributionNormalityStatistical hypothesis testingEconometricsApplied mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By modifying the statistic of Malkovich and Afifi (1973 Malkovich , J. F. , Afifi , A. A. ( 1973 ). On tests for multivariate normality . J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 68 : 176 – 179 .[Taylor & Francis Online], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]), we introduce and study the properties of a notion of multivariate skewness that provides both a magnitude and an overall direction for the skewness present in multivariate data. This notion leads to a test statistic for the nonparametric null hypothesis of multivariate symmetry. Under mild assumptions, we find the asymptotic distribution of the test statistic and evaluate, by simulation, the convergence of the finite sample size percentiles to their limits. We also present an associated test statistic for multivariate normality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.016
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.079
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.083

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0160.079
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.007
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0020.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.265
GPT teacher head0.540
Teacher spread0.274 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCommunication in Statistics- Theory and MethodsSame topicAdvanced Statistical Methods and ModelsFrench-language works237,207