Lipid Binding of the Exchangeable Apolipoprotein Apolipophorin III Induces Major Changes in Fluorescence Properties of Tryptophans 115 and 130
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of lipid association on the local environment of the two tryptophan residues of Locusta migratoria apolipophorin III (apoLp-III) has been studied. In the lipid-free state, Trp115 in helix 4 is buried in the hydrophobic interior of the helix bundle, while Trp130 is located in a loop connecting helices 4 and 5. Fluorescence spectroscopy of single Trp mutants revealed an emission maximum (lambda(max)) of 321 nm for apoLp-III-W@115 (excitation 280 nm) which red-shifted to 327 nm upon binding to dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC). ApoLp-III-W@130 displayed a lambda(max) of 338 nm while interaction with DMPC resulted in a blue shift to 331 nm. Quenching studies with KI and acrylamide revealed decreased accessibility to Trp115 compared to Trp130, while lipid binding induced a decrease in quenching of Trp130. Aromatic circular dichroism (CD) spectra showed that Trp vibronic transitions at 278, 286, and 294 nm for lipid-free apoLp-III were caused by Trp115. Upon lipid association, aromatic extrema are reversed in sign, becoming entirely negative with both Trp residues contributing to the vibronic transitions, implying restriction in side-chain mobility of these residues. Thus, lambda(max), quencher accessibility, and aromatic CD analysis indicate that Trp115 is much less solvent-exposed than Trp130. Differences in fluorescence properties of these residues are minimized in the lipid-bound state, a result of relocation of Trp115 and Trp130 into the lipid milieu. Thus, in addition to the hydrophobic faces of apoLp-III amphipathic alpha-helices, the loop region containing Trp130 comes in close contact with DMPC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".