MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Prologue

2007· review· en· W2068895964 on OpenAlexaffabout
Carole A. Estabrooks

Bibliographic record

VenueNursing Research · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicHealth Policy Implementation Science
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrologueLibrary scienceResearch programManagementMedical educationMedicinePolitical scienceNursingGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Carole A. Estabrooks, PhD, RN, is Professor and Canada Research Chair in Knowledge Translation, Knowledge Utilization Studies Program, Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. Supported by a Canada Research Chair award to Dr. Carole A. Estabrooks and operating funds from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for the research program "Knowledge Utilization and Policy Implementation: A Five Year Program of Research" (2002-2007; Grant 53107). Corresponding author: Carole A. Estabrooks, PhD, RN, Faculty of Nursing, 3rd Floor, Clinical Science Building, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada T6G 2G3 (e-mail: [email protected]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.003
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.4190.142

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.984
GPT teacher head0.894
Teacher spread0.090 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNursing ResearchSame topicHealth Policy Implementation ScienceFrench-language works237,207