MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2068899951 · doi:10.2113/gsecongeo.97.1.11

The St. Eugene Deposit, British Columbia: A Metamorphosed Ag-Pb-Zn Vein in Proterozoic Belt-Purcell Rocks

2002· article· en· W2068899951 on OpenAlexaffabout
Isabelle Joncas, Georges Beaudoin

Bibliographic record

VenueEconomic Geology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProterozoicGeologyGeochemistryVeinArchaeologySeismologyGeographyTectonicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The St. Eugene deposit is an Ag-Pb-Zn vein deposit hosted by clastic sedimentary rocks of the Purcell Supergroup, which were metamorphosed during the East Kootenay orogeny. Hydrothermal metasomatism created an alteration zone surrounding the veins that we subdivide into four facies separated by gradational contacts: garnet-chlorite, internal, intermediate, and external. Chemical and isotopic exchanges between wall rocks and hydrothermal fluid created a chemical reaction zone that is characterized by gains in FeO, MnO, Pb, Zn, and Sb and by losses in CaO, Na 2 O, K 2 O, Sr, Rb, and Cs. Wall-rock δ 18 O values decrease from the vein selvage outward because of water-rock exchange with a metamorphic fluid with a high δ 18 O value. Sulfur in vein sulfides is derived from local wall rock. Mn-rich garnet formed near the quartz sulfide vein during metamorphism because the stability temperature of garnet is lowered in rocks hydrothermally enriched in Mn. The occurrence of manganiferous garnet in Belt-Purcell rocks should be regarded as a metallotect for syngenetic and epigenetic mineralization in those rocks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.065
Threshold uncertainty score0.131

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.155
Teacher spread0.147 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEconomic GeologySame topicGeological and Geochemical AnalysisFrench-language works237,207