The postnatal changes in red blood cell NO levels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: To determine the levels of RBC HbSNO and HbFe(II)NO using chemiluminescence in very low birth weight infants breathing room air, during the first 2 days of life. METHOD: RBC NO values were compared to the levels obtained in cord blood at birth from infants of similar gestational age. Five infants ranging from 25 to 27 weeks of gestation were sampled between 12 and 24 h after birth. These infants were considered as the postnatal group and had normal blood gases at room air. RESULTS: The HbSNO levels were increased in the postnatal group from 49.0 +/- 17.4 nm to 152.3 +/- 54.3 nm (p = 0.0006). There was no difference in HbFe(II)NO levels between the two groups (mean of 267.6 +/- 186.5 nm in cord blood and 180.3 +/- 89.2 nm in the postnatal sample. CONCLUSION: The increase in HbSNO postnatally could be an important mechanism for the neonatal pulmonary adaptation to extra-uterine life.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".